I am Not Just a Lumberjack and I’m Not Actually OK; Angry Gambler Strikes Back

febrero 18, 2020|Publicado por: More Chilli Slot

Comentarios desactivados en I am Not Just a Lumberjack and I’m Not Actually OK; Angry Gambler Strikes Back

ï»¿I am Not Just a Lumberjack and I’m Not Actually OK; Angry Gambler Strikes Back

Not everyone carrying an axe is just a lumberjack

Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Probably not, since most lumberjacks do not generally carry their axes around with them on nights out. But two stories have popped up in the media showing that non-lumberjacks don’t necessarily stick to these rules.

Axing For Trouble

The first of these two tales of violence happened in a village bar in Fontaniva, Italy, in which a disgruntled gambler decided to exact his revenge on some naive slots machines after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in 2 weeks.

The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and video clip streaming internet sites, where watchers can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.

The machine hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits after blowing off steam. Either it was a sign of victory, or a show of friendship towards these machines that are particular. Whenever coping with crazy, interpretations are anyone’s guess.

The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a nearby bar.

‘ myfreepokies.com He comes in here all the right time to play the machines,’ said who owns the bar, who chose probably wisely- to remain nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a complete great deal of cash. He could be a laborer and only works every now and then.’ evidently, this is certainly one worker who keeps his own equipment handy.

‘He’s normally a very peaceful man. He just walked in really calmly having an axe and smashed all the machines. There had been several customers they were terrified,’ he added by them at the time and.

The man was sentenced for six months for criminal damage and possession of an offensive weapon as a result of his strangely calm yet violent outburst. But jail overcrowding got him off with nothing significantly more than a slap on the hand.

But Wait, There’s More…

The 2nd of the two tales is just a bit more frightening, due to the fact axe was wielded maybe not at the slots, but at a member of the employees at a shop that is betting the Welsh capital of Cardiff.

Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ event left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes shop that is betting Cardiff ‘in a situation of shock.’

Before raiding the till and making off with some money, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over their head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ worker with injury or worse if he didn’t comply.

A police spokesperson investigating the crime said that two men, both wearing ski masks, entered the bookie’s store at 9:30 pm regarding the night of the incident. One calmly endured guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the assistant utilizing the tree-chopping gun.

The frightened shop assistant then handed over what police described as a ‘quantity of cash,’ therefore the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven by a suspect that is third.

Police are now appealing to the local public for information that could help apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did not wait calmly for arresting officers to arrive regarding the scene.

Whose Casino Can It Be Anyway? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out

The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan

Whilst every of the three licensing battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has already established its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight over the casino slated to be found in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston candidate that is mayoral threatening a lawsuit over one particular proposition that would put a casino into the neighboring town of Everett.

Voting Rights

The legal choice is associated with the idea that neighboring communities would be afflicted with casino projects, but won’t have a chance to vote on whether those casinos must be opened in the beginning. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, a candidate for mayor of Boston, happens to be one of a handful of applicants whom have suggested that all of Boston should be able to vote on a casino that could be located in East Boston, for example.

It is unfair to the surrounding communities when it comes to the proposed Wynn casino project in Everett, Conley says that allowing only Everett residents to vote on. Should the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would file suit to stop the Everett casino based regarding the impact it would have on many Boston areas.

‘The Wynn proposal ended up being voted…on in only one community,’ Conley stated throughout a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will bear its traffic, economic, and social burdens but receive none of the proposed advantages.’

According to the state laws that produced the chance for three casinos that are new Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually get a vote on whether or not to permit the projects to be built. However, casino developers are needed to negotiate payment, with arbitration required in the event that gambling enterprises and governments that are localn’t arrived at a resolution by themselves.

Conley has proposed going for a path that isn’t really outlined in the 2011 casino law in terms of the East Boston casino proposal, one that’s being developed by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He could have the entire city of Boston vote on whether to approve the proposal, while still giving East Boston veto power throughout the vote that is entire. In other words, the casino would have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the entire city in an effort to be authorized.

Yay or Nay?

While Conley have not specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposition, a Boston world survey discovered that six of the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question had been in favor of it, with just two coming away against it (with Conley and one other candidate not responding to the question). Meanwhile, four of ten candidates supported allowing the entire town to vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to simply East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents unearthed that 44% were in support of the casino, while 37% opposed it.

No matter if voters return these proposals, just one will ultimately be chosen by the state because the site that is future of casino in the Boston area. Along with the Everett and East Boston casino plans, addititionally there is a proposal that is competing Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.

Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO

Chuka Umunna, taken fully to task for accepting donation

Chuka Umunna, cited as the increasing celebrity of the united kingdom’s Labour Party who has publicly announced his discontent towards the bookmaking industry got their own hand caught in the recreations book cookie jar after accepting a contribution of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from the retired leading activities company that is betting.

Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation

As a betting shop critic whom has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna nevertheless accepted the big contribution from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing members of the Conservative Party to call the shadow business secretary out, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double standards.

Since Gala Coral Group is one of the largest bookies in Britain and accounts for the large numbers of betting outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the nation- it just didn’t really read well.

Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign directed at reducing the spread of bookies and betting shops in the area roads of his south London Streatham constituency, and went so far as to promise ‘new powers to get a handle on the number of betting shops.’

‘I know there is certainly huge concern that some streets in our area are steadily replenishing with wagering shops and pay day loan companies that take advantage of our community, as opposed to help us,’ wrote Umunna in a study to local voters earlier this year.

‘ Can anyone really credibly believe anything Chuka ever Umunna states?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says one thing in public places and does another behind closed doors. His hypocrisy seems to be limitless.’ And that is very unusual for a politician.

Spared on a Technicality

However, fighting back in the corner associated with the Labour Party MP, a spokesperson for Umunna stated that ‘this contribution was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a individual capacity, and was accepted in respect using the guidelines and properly declared.’

Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the office of Chuka Umunna in his capability as Shadow Secretary of State for Business, as well as for staffing,’ so it does officially pass as legitimate.

Even though Goulden is no more a relative head of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he spent as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group ensures that he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.

Whether this is a entirely innocent contribution or not, and whether or otherwise not the Conservative Party that are looking to ruin the publicity of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after taking this kind of hard stance against the spread of the industry in their local constituency.

‘ The thing that is only know he truly believes is that the capital is filled with ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ reported Bob Neill.

Umunna, that is considered to be described as a future Labour Party leader, has experienced his share that is fair of as earlier this year their office ended up being accused of modifying their Wikipedia page showing comparisons between himself and Barack Obama.